| [Part 1] [Part 2] [Part 3] |
|
||||||
|
|
§2.04 Preliminary Joint Assessment[1] Hearing on Assessment Child welfare services and the probation department must prepare a joint assessment pursuant to local protocols when it appears that a child comes within the description to be either a dependent or a ward of the court. You must hold a hearing on the assessment to determine which status will serve the child’s best interest and protect society. [WIC §241.1(a), (b); CRC 5.512(a), (d), (i).] Except when there is a written protocol for dual status children, a minor cannot simultaneously be both a dependent and a ward. [WIC §241.1(d).] If a child is detained, you must hold the hearing concurrent with, or as soon as possible after, the detention hearing, but no later than 15 court days after the detention order. If the child is not detained, hold the hearing before the jurisdiction hearing and within 30 days of the petition date. [CRC 5.512(e).] At the joint assessment hearing, one appellate court has held that there is no federal due process right to present evidence and to cross-examine witnesses and the preparers of the joint assessment report. [In re Henry S. (2006) 140 CA4th 248, 259.] [2] Educational Needs You should determine who holds the educational rights for the child at the initial hearing, and which school, if any, the child is enrolled in and attending. [CRC 5.651.] If you determine that the child is not attending the child’s school of origin, you should consider whether the child was not properly afforded the right to attend the school of origin. [CRC 5.651(b).] You may also limit the educational rights of the parent or guardian, when appropriate. [CRC 5.534(j), 5.650.] See further discussion in §3.11. The child welfare service and probation departments may jointly assess and recommend that a child be designated a dual status child if the departments and your presiding judge have created a jointly written protocol for the process. [WIC §241.1(e).] For example, in such a county, dependency jurisdiction may be suspended or put on hold while the dual status child is subject to jurisdiction as a ward of the court. The protocol must ensure a seamless transition from wardship to dependency jurisdiction so that services to the child are not disrupted on termination of wardship. [See WIC §366.5.]
|
||||||
|
|||||||