Skip NavigationSmall Claims Court: Consumer and Substantive Laws
 




 




§2.06 Return of Security Deposit

The landlord may retain security deposit money only to the extent reasonably necessary for the purposes specified in CC §1950.5(b) (see §2.02). [CC §1950.5(e).] It is the landlord’s burden to show the reasonableness of security amounts retained. [CC §1950.5(l).] The landlord is not obligated to pay interest on a tenant’s retained security deposit [Korens v R.W. Zukin Corp. (1989) 212 CA3d 1054, 1058] unless the deposit has been retained in bad faith [see CC §1950.5(l)].

The landlord may not assert a claim against the tenant or the security deposit for ordinary wear and tear or preexisting damages or defective conditions. [CC §1950.5(e); see §2.03.] A tenant who vacates is not obligated to restore the rental premises in a better condition than when the tenancy commenced. [Haupt v La Brea Heating Co. (1955) 133 CA2d Supp 784, 788–789.] If the tenant exercises ordinary care in preserving the premises, the landlord cannot deduct for normal deterioration in the premises caused by use and the passage of time. [See Kanner v Globe Bottling Co. (1969) 273 CA2d 559, 565.]

 

Watch how a judge admits evidence relating to a landlord's claims against the security deposit and to a tenant's attempted counterclaim.


(Start video by clicking the Play Play button button.)
transcript
Help With Video

 
Lesson 2:
Tenant Security Deposits
 
 
    back        Back         page 11 of 100         Next        next